Troy Michigan Estate Planning, Probate and Living Trusts Attorneys Strategic Legal Services, P.C.
 

HOME > Financial Advisor Education Corner > Educational Alerts

Educational Alerts
Educational Alerts are written on topics that effect various aspects of estate planning and the laws that govern it. They are usually published and posted to this site at the end of each month. Occasionally newsworthy events will initiate the release of additional alerts at the time the news breaks. The purpose of an Estate Planning Update is to bring important information to the financial advisors in the community. Our hope is that this information better equips you to assist your clients.

Strategic Legal Services, P.C. releases important estate planning and related articles on a regular basis. Please take a moment to register to receive full access to our Educational Alerts and FYIs.

Enter the password that was given to you:



Enrollment Period for Medicare Part D on the Horizon
This article gives a brief explanation of Medicare Part D, the new prescription drug plan. Seniors will begin receiving information about this plan between mid-October and year-end.

Potential Changes to Medicaid Laws May Warrant Taking Action Now
This article addresses many of the proposals being set forth by the Department of Health and Human Services Commission and the National Governor's Association for Medicaid Reform. Many of these proposals will change the manner in which Medicaid planning will be done in the future and how your clients may want to accelerate their planning before any changes are made.

Fifth Circuit Releases Long Awaited Strangi Opinion
This month's alert highlights the findings of the Strangi 4 FLP case. This is the second appeal to the 5th Circuit. The opinion is a partial victory for the IRS, but the key points of the case are the issues regarding implied agreements (and use of FLP assets to pay estate administration expenses, debts of the decedent and estate taxes) and what is business and non-business purposes are sufficient to meet the "bona fide transfer for fair value" exceptio under IRC 2036.

2036 Is Not Just for Family Limited Partnerships
In past alerts we have informed you how the IRS has had successes in using IRC § 2036 to pull back transferred partnership assets into the estate of a decedent, thwarting the taxpayer's plans to obtain a discount. These victories have emboldened the IRS to apply the requirements of IRC § 2036 against other types of intra-family transfers.

Taxpayers Using FLPs Continue to Trip Over Section 2036
The article examines three new FLP cases in which the Service was victorious. It stresses the need for clients to have their FLP agreements and practices reviewed.

Chances for Repeal of the Estate Tax Lessen -- Congress May Settle for Permanent Increase in Exemption Amount
The article examines pending legislation concerning potential repeal of the estate tax. It discusses the more likely outcome of an increase of the applicable exclusion amount. It concludes that the need for estate planning will remain greater than ever for non-tax reasons.

Taxpayers Fight and Win State Estate Tax Battles
In 2001, the federal government passed the Economic Growth and Tax Reform Reconciliation Act of 2001 (“EGTRRA”). One of the provisions of EGTRRA was the gradual reduction and then elimination (in 2004) of the state death tax credit on the federal estate tax return. About three-quarters of the states limited the amount of the death taxes they received to the amount of the state death credit. With the reduction in the credit, these “pick-up” states started to see their tax revenues decline and as a result about one-third of them “decoupled” from the federal system. The decoupling states implemented their own estate tax regime based on federal law that was in existence prior to EGTRRA. In some circumstances this resulted in taxpayers paying a higher combined federal and state estate tax than they would have paid under the law before the enactment of EGTRRA, even though EGTRRA was heavily promoted as a tax reduction.

Joint Committee on Taxation Proposes Tax Law Changes Effecting Estate Planning
On January 27, 2005, the Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) released a 435 page report entitled "JCS-02-05 Options to Improve Tax Compliance and Reform Tax Expenditures." Assuming that the estate tax is not repealed, the following proposals contained in the JCT report may be enacted in order to tighten up several estate planning strategies the IRS has viewed as abusive.

Court Upholds Trust Nominee Clause and Finds No Revocation Where the Formalities of Revocation and Amendment Were Not Followed by the Surviving Trustor
During the course of a long marriage, George and Barbara Heaps executed a joint revocable living trust with both spouses acting as co-trustees. It provided that the trust would split into two trusts, a “family trust” and a “marital trust,” after the death of the first of them. The surviving spouse would act as co-trustee over the “family trust” with George and Barbara’s son and son-in-law. The surviving spouse would serve as the sole trustee over the “marital trust.”

Disclaimer Proves Fatal to Estate Plan
Mr. Katz executed a will in 1991 that called for the creation of a "pecuniary credit shelter trust" equal to the amount of the "aggregate federal estate tax exemption equivalent." The will language further provided that the credit shelter trust "shall not be reduced on account of any disclaimer by my wife." Finally, another provision in the will stated conflicting provision in this will, "if my wife disclaims any interest in any portion of the property otherwise passing outright to her under this Article of my will, such portion shall be added to the [credit shelter] trust." The purpose of the credit shelter trust created under Mr. Katz's will was to place an amount equal to the amount that can pass free of estate tax into trust so that it would eventually pass to his children without being subject to estate taxes in his wife's estate.

President Signs the Working Families Tax Relief Act and the American Jobs Creation Act
President Bush signed into law the Working Families Tax Relief Act of 2004. It provides for approximately $146 billion in tax breaks aimed primarily at middle-income taxpayers and businesses of all sizes.

Bank and Trust Officer Held Liable for Estate Tax
Learn the facts as well as lessons that should be learned from the case of Hatleberg v. Norwest Bank Wisconsin, 678 N.W.2d 302 (Wis. App. 2/24/2004)

IRS Blesses Planning With Grantor Trusts In Revenue Ruling 2004-64
The IRS, with its release of Revenue Ruling 2004-64, has given its approval to the use of grantor trusts as an income and estate planning strategy and it has removed any confusion as to whether the trust must contain a provision for the reimbursement of income taxes paid by the grantor.

Mistake in Preparing Estate Tax Return Costs Taxpayer:IRS Provides No Relief
The facts in PLR 200422050 are as follows: a decedent’s will left her estate in trust for the benefit of her husband. The trust provided that the husband was to receive all income from the trust and he could compel the trustee to make trust assets productive. As a result of these provisions, the trust would qualify for the federal estate tax marital deduction under IRC § 2056 as a qualified terminable interest property (“QTIP”) trust if the executor made an election under IRC § 2056(b)(7).

Failure to Qualify for Marital Deduction Can Cost Hundreds of Thousands
The amount that can be given at death free of estate taxes in 2004 is $1.5 million. With proper planning, a married couple can double that amount to $3 million. Where an estate is greater than $3 million, the estate tax on the excess can be deferred until the death of the surviving spouse, but only if proper planning is put in place. This is because of the unlimited federal estate tax marital deduction. Where the first spouse to die wants to control where the excess assets go after the death of the surviving spouse (by giving the surviving spouse only a life estate in the excess assets), a special kind of trust, known as a Qualified Terminable Interest Property Trust (or QTIP Trust) must be used.

Friday the Thirteenth Bad Luck for Life Insurance in Section 412(i) Plans
Friday the Thirteenth was truly unlucky for certain life insurance arrangements, because the Treasury issued two Revenue Rulings, a Revenue Procedure, and a set of Proposed Treasury Regulations designed to eliminate perceived abuses in the use of life insurance in certain retirement plans described in Section 412(i). Note, however, that the scope of the guidance goes far beyond 412(i) plans - and even beyond retirement plans.

FDIC Simplifies Trust Rules: Expanded Coverage Could Benefit Many Consumers
In 2003, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") solicited comments to its two proposed alternatives for simplifying the rules for insuring bank accounts owned by trusts. After reviewing the comments it received, on January 13, 2004 the FDIC announced a new regulation for trust bank accounts.

Distributions from Retirement Plans or Individual Retirement Accounts Can Reduce or Eliminate Estimated Tax Underpayment Penalties
Seniors and self-employed individuals often complain about having to make quarterly estimated income tax payments. Failure to make the payments can lead to underpayment penalties and interest (calculated using the federal short term rate plus an additional three percent) having to be paid on income taxes due.

Circumstances Surrounding Drafting, Execution, and Administration of a Prenuptial Agreement Determine Its Effectiveness
The planning done before marriage is often as important as planning after marriage in assuring that a client’s estate planning wishes are carried out. Laws governing prenuptial agreements vary somewhat from state to state, but often the circumstances surrounding the drafting, execution, and administration of a prenuptial agreement are crucial to the effectiveness of the agreement.

Walking Through the "Basic" Estate Plan
Start your clients off with the very basics so that they appreciate the value of each planning strategy you employ.

HIPAA Protected Health Information Provisions Become Effective – Clients Need to Take Action Now
On April 14, 2003, the privacy provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104-191, 45 CFR §§ 160–164, affectionately dubbed HIPAA, went into effect. The new regulations have caused much turmoil among "covered entities" (e.g., doctors, hospitals, nursing home facilities, and insurance companies), as they will now, for the first time, be subject to federally imposed sanctions and monetary fines for unauthorized disclosure of "private health information." The new law has caused many health care providers to clamp down on the release of medical records and other health care information to anyone other than the patient.

Tricks and Traps Concerning Annuities
Because there are many tax traps concerning annuities, it is important for the financial advisor to know the treatment of annuities when advising clients.

Care Must Be Taken When Disinheriting an Heir
It is not uncommon for a person to place provisions in his or her will or trust to exclude an heir from receiving an inheritance. Such was the desire of Mary Bartels, who wished to disinherit her daughter, Deborah Smith, and whose will was the subject of dispute in the case In the Matter of the Estate of Mary Alberta Bartels, Deceased, 184 Or. App. 448, 56 P.3d 501 (October 23, 2002).





Strategic Legal Services, P.C. Office Locations
Estate Planning Attorneys for Troy, MI
© 2009 American Academy of Estate Planning Attorneys
Disclaimer